What is the biggest difference between Oryon and Semgrep?

Semgrep is a strong fit for rule-centric AppSec programs. Oryon is stronger when you want the daily security loop to start inside VS Code with local analysis, conservative triage, and repo-linked team memory.

Can we use Oryon and Semgrep together?

Yes. Many teams can keep Semgrep in broader AppSec workflows while using Oryon as the developer-facing security layer inside the IDE.

What should we evaluate in a pilot?

Focus on developer signal quality, how quickly false positives are handled, whether local scans fit the team workflow, and how useful the linked dashboard becomes once the repository is synced.

Competitive research

Alternative to Semgrep for Teams That Want Security Inside the IDE

Semgrep is a strong choice when your program is centered on rules and AppSec control. Oryon is built for teams that want local-first scanning in VS Code-based editors, conservative AI triage, and a tighter path from code to dashboard.

See Oryon on your repo View head-to-head

Search intent

Why teams look for an alternative to %{competitor_name}

What the team is usually trying to fix

You want a tighter developer workflow inside VS Code, not another place the team checks later.
You need false-positive handling that combines heuristic filtering, strict AI review, and shared suppressions.
You want code findings and dependency visibility in the same local workflow, with dashboard sync only when the repo is linked.

Honest comparison

Side-by-side scorecard

Criterion	Oryon	Semgrep
Workflow center	VS Code-based workflow with local scanning, conservative triage, and optional dashboard sync.	Rule-driven AppSec workflow with strong customization and platform governance.
Where analysis runs	Code and dependency analysis run locally in the editor.	Semgrep supports CLI, IDE, and platform workflows, often organized around the Semgrep platform.
How noise is reduced	Heuristic prefilter, strict two-pass AI consensus, and shared suppressions.	Rule quality, custom rule tuning, and platform-based triage.
Shared team memory	Repo-linked dashboard state and false-positive memory shared across future scans.	Platform findings, policies, and workflow state.
Best fit	Engineering-led teams that want security to live inside daily coding.	Teams investing heavily in rule authoring, policy control, and broader AppSec rollout.

Real product fit

When each product is the better choice

Choose Oryon if

Your developers live in VS Code-based editors and want signal before CI becomes the bottleneck.
You want local-first analysis with strict keep-by-default guardrails in AI triage.
You want shared false positives and dashboard history without centering everything on the platform.

Choose %{competitor_name} if

You already run a mature Semgrep program and custom rule engineering is a strategic advantage.
Your AppSec team prefers platform governance and policy control over an IDE-first operating model.
You want to optimize around Semgrep's rule ecosystem across many deployment paths.

Fast validation

How to run a serious pilot

Link one representative repository from the extension and run local scans during normal coding.
Measure which findings still matter after prefilter, strict AI triage, and shared suppressions.
Decide whether your team values tighter IDE workflow or broader rule-program control.

Key questions

Frequently asked questions

What is the biggest difference between Oryon and Semgrep?: Semgrep is a strong fit for rule-centric AppSec programs. Oryon is stronger when you want the daily security loop to start inside VS Code with local analysis, conservative triage, and repo-linked team memory.
Can we use Oryon and Semgrep together?: Yes. Many teams can keep Semgrep in broader AppSec workflows while using Oryon as the developer-facing security layer inside the IDE.
What should we evaluate in a pilot?: Focus on developer signal quality, how quickly false positives are handled, whether local scans fit the team workflow, and how useful the linked dashboard becomes once the repository is synced.